Does a company's right to protect its trade secrets outweigh a journalist's right to shield the identity of a news source? A case moving through the appellate courts, pitting Apple against three online journalists, may provide the answer.
We've always known it; now an exhaustive study confirms it: People who talk on cell phones, eat food, fiddle with their CD players or apply makeup while driving are far more likely to cause an accident than people who simply pay attention and drive.
At least that's what a dancing British sheep in a top hat wants to tell you. Plus: Fantasy meets bloody reality in a cartoon about a homicidal maniac with a dream. In Table of Malcontents.
Instead of the annoying buzz of current cell-phone vibrating alerts, a new design can be applied anywhere on the body that will "stimulate" you when a call comes in. Plus: Links from the Sex Drive Podcast. In Sex Drive Daily.
With no mileage boost and a huge price tag, Honda's up-market alternative looks like a loser. Plus: More folks enjoy Hummers.... Plug-in hybrid hits 150 miles. In Autopia.
The editors of social site Digg.com stand accused of fraud and favoritism. But are they at fault? Plus: Web 2.1 and the server-side blink tag. In Monkey Bites.
